|Next: Expert CommentaryGoto: Table of Content, orDownload PDF Copy
Insights & recommendations for governments:
- Governments in many OIC countries set the tone for productivity across all institutions within their countries.
- Our work-hour analysis shows a few different approaches of some OIC countries, which opens the question as to which models are most effective in delivering the right balance of work productivity and employee satisfaction.
- Although a much detailed analysis of economic impact would have to be undertaken to fully understand the complexities of Ramadan work reduction and adjustment, the economic impact assessment in this study shows that the economies suffer roughly 4% in monthly GDP per hour per day of work reduction.
- Undoubtedly, no dollar value can be placed on spiritual gains and divine blessings of increased worship during Ramadan, but the fact that there are different approaches to work-hour reduction and adjustment does suggest that governments should evaluate whether their Ramadan policies maintain the right balance of work responsibility and spiritual flexibility during Ramadan.
- Some key question for governments to evaluate:
- Is a two hour reduction necessary?
- Is a mix of one hour reduction and one hour adjustment optimal (as practiced generally in Indonesia and Malaysia)?
- Do hour reductions generate the desired increase in spiritual connectivity, or do they have an adverse effect (e.g. laziness, apathy, etc.)?
- Should a segmented or other flexible approach be considered, for example, for certain types of hard labor?
Next >> Ramadan Study: Expert Commentary
- Conducted a survey to determine actual Ramadan practices and expectations of Muslim workers, and
- Looked at Ramadan work-hour differences in various Muslim majority countries and its resulting economic impact, and to suggest areas of Ramadan productivity improvements.