|
Mohammad Akram, a furniture trader from
Pakistan, was on his last attempt to close
a possible deal with an American buyer.
The phone call ended with sheer disappointment
when the buyer concluded, "To be honest,
we love your product, but my boss is concerned
with where the money's going to go. you
know with all this talk of terrorist fundings.I
hope you understand. We are sorry."
|
|
As
alarming as such an objection maybe, such barriers
are becoming much too familiar to businesses in
the Muslim world. National image after-all can
be a company's biggest asset or its worst liability.
For
example, for most western consumers, 'Made in
Japan', 'Germany', or 'Italy', evoke images of
quality, innovation, and class. Whereas, 'Made
in Indonesia', 'Pakistan', or 'Saudi Arabia' only
stir up images of terrorism, bombings, or overall
instability.
|
| I
posed these questions to Mr. Simon Anholt,
one of the world's leading nation-branding
expert. Mr. Anholt advises governments (including
Britain, Croatia and Slovenia) and corporations
(including DreamWorks, DuPont and Timberland)
and is also the author of Brand New Justice:
The Upside of Global Branding and has guest-edited
a Special Issue of the Journal of Brand Management
on the subject of Nation as Brand. |
|
According
to Mr. Anholt, "Its not absolutely hopeless!"
The
Golden Rule!
The
golden rule to managing such an image crisis is
"not to mention the problem at all!"
Specifically,
in the case of marketing campaigns involving advertising,
trade show materials etc., it would be best not
to bring up the image issue. This sounds like
a no-brainer, but Mr. Anholt points out that some
companies do fall into the trap of a common piece
of marketing wisdom, which says; "I need to acknowledge
my consumers' negative perception and counter
it." But in this case, he says that acknowledging
the problem in a marketing campaign is actually
a very bad thing to do for the following three
reasons.
"First
of all, by raising the problem and mentioning
it in your marketing or your business dealing
you are making a large number of additional people
worried that either weren't aware of it or weren't
worrying about it in the first place!"
"Secondly,
for people that were even a little bit worried
about it, you are going to make them more worried
about it, because the psychology of the consumers
is, 'My God! If they're talking about it then
it must be really bad'."
The
third reason is that it's, in any case, impossible
for companies to tackle such huge problems as
the negative perception of a country or the negative
perception of an entire world religion. People
are very warmly attached to their prejudices about
countries and religions and such larger issues.
"Its pointless and futile to expect such changes
through a few simple pieces of paid-for communication
by a company."
"Talk
about the Good Stuff."
So
what can be done? Mr. Anholt suggests, "the truly
sensible and the truly humble approach is just
to be what you are, to be a seller of products,
to say here's what we do and its good. At the
same time there are plenty of tricks and techniques
that can be applied for getting around bad press
and negative association."
In
essence, cotton merchants in Egypt, or electronics
manufacturers in Indonesia, or surgical goods
or technology outsourcing companies in Pakistan
should over aggressively highlight the quality
of their products and services and focus on applying
the most competitive global business strategies.
And in regards to the tips and tricks for getting
around bad press, an example of a sensible thing
to do would be to reach back in history to a "safe
time" for the marketing messages. Mr. Anholt refers
"safe time" as a period where, for example, an
average American consumer does not have a problem
with an average Indonesian company and highlight
the tradition of that relationship. Another example
includes a media relations campaign by the Egyptian
Cotton Board last year that focused on the quality
of its cotton, its history, and reputation. The
key there was to avoid making glossy advertisements,
which the consumers in such cases are easy to
identify as cover-ups.
Companies
as Agents of Change
Even
though Mr. Anholt suggests that it is futile for
businesses to affect broader perception changes,
he also points out that, in the long-run, successful
branded companies more than anything can do most
to re-stabilize the image problems. "Generally
speaking it is noticeable how unaffected peoples'
buying decisions are by political and social circumstances.
You can have, for example, American consumers
criticizing, from mere point of ignorance the
behavior of Muslim countries left, right, and
center, but if they are happily buying, and happily
using a product, then they will not care that
it comes from a Muslim country. Consumers don't
mind such little contradictions at all."
'Made
in China' and 'Made in India' are two labels that
are a great case in point. Until only a decade
or so ago, to much of the West, China was associated
with images of poverty, over population, the Tiananmen
Square protests of 1989, its aggressive policies
towards the Tibetans and Taiwanese, and ofcourse
its overall Communist structure. Today however,
the image of China is changing for the better,
thanks to its economic hyper growth driven by
private enterprise and focussed government support.
India is another example. Only a decade ago, poverty,
over-population, and the "Indiana Jones - Temple
of Doom" depicted imagery of snake charmers, elephants
and jungles, drove India's image. Today, India
is associated with the picture of a modern, highly
skilled and a progressive society whose turn-around
can be credited to its enterprising technology
business successes.
So
the right thing for companies in Muslim countries
to do is to focus on producing a great product
and selling honestly and well, and to the right
people. In doing so they will help revitalize
the image of their country in the West, more than
anything else will.
| Key
Learnings: |
 |
Businesses
should avoid addressing the image
issues in their marketing campaigns
such as advertising and promotional
materials. Only during one-on-one
communications should these issues
be addressed |
 |
The
only practical thing a business
can do is to focus on delivering
the best products and services
to the right markets and build
a brand based on the strengths
of their products. Succesful brands
will in essense have the greatest
affect in improving the image. |
 |
Tactics
for addressing bad press and negative
association include reaching out
to a "safe time" in
communications, and applying low-key
public relation campaign that
emphasizes genuine qualities of
the products/ services |
|
|
Your
Feedback
"To
me is easier do like western companies do: triangle
or simply de-localize mere packaging on a, say,
made in italy brand, and bypass also wto rules
and similar tricks to keep artificially your products
not - competitive in western markets."
Mario, Italy
|